Etcd's backup/restore tooling is good for recovering from data loss in a single etcd cluster. For example, it is a good idea to take a backup of etcd prior to upgrading etcd itself. For more sophisticated management of your Kubernetes cluster backups and restores, we feel that Velero is generally a better approach. It gives you the ability to throw away an unstable cluster and restore your Kubernetes resources and data into a new cluster, which you can't do easily just by backing up and restoring etcd.
Examples of cases where Velero is useful:
Yes, with some exceptions. For example, when Velero restores pods it deletes the
nodeName from the
pod so that it can be scheduled onto a new node. You can see some more examples of the differences
We strongly recommend that each Velero instance use a distinct bucket/prefix combination to store backups. Having multiple Velero instances write backups to the same bucket/prefix combination can lead to numerous problems - failed backups, overwritten backups, inadvertently deleted backups, etc., all of which can be avoided by using a separate bucket + prefix per Velero instance.
It's fine to have multiple Velero instances back up to the same bucket if each instance uses its own
prefix within the bucket. This can be configured in your
BackupStorageLocation, by setting the
spec.objectStorage.prefix field. It's also fine to use a distinct bucket for each Velero instance,
and not to use prefixes at all.
Related to this, if you need to restore a backup that was created in cluster A into cluster B, you may
configure cluster B with a backup storage location that points to cluster A's bucket/prefix. If you do
this, you should configure the storage location pointing to cluster A's bucket/prefix in
--access-mode=ReadOnly flag on the
velero backup-location create command. This will ensure no
new backups are created from Cluster B in Cluster A's bucket/prefix, and no existing backups are deleted